|
Last but not least...Johnny!
|
|
"Congratulations to the both of you. With that being said I'd like to start by pointing out that I feel you both played a pretty pathetic game. KJ you did absolutely nothing the entire game but win two immunities. You claimed to "have alliances" when in fact you were apart of someone else's alliance/plan. Not once did you actually play strategically to get your self further other than voting me out and winning immunity (One immunity I might add because I don't feel that the Morse code game was properly explained) You never really knew what was going on and were just pulled along the entire game. Brentin you also didn't do a whole lot in this game. Much to your dismay I was always calling the shots. (Except for on two occasions; my ousting and the order reversal of Devyn/Jeffery) You were my puppet just like everyone else, doing exactly what I wanted. Hardly a strategy if you ask me. You only won immunity once and that was because you knew exactly what Jessie and my picks for the challenge were. My vote is very much still up for grabs seeing as I think you both played a crappy game. I have specific questions for both of you, some are random question with no right or wrong answer and others are game related. If you want to receive my vote answer these questions truthfully and to the best of your knowledge.
Questions for KJ 1) Did you have an alliance with Sara? When was this established? Is it not true that you and Sara often have alliances in every game you two play in? 2) Aside from the alliance with me, (and mostly likely with Sara) did you have any other alliances? If you did, when were these formed? 3) It's pretty evident you sucked at almost all of the challenges. You were never a competitor for any of them (except the two you won). Why did you suck so badly on these challenges? Was it because you're just pathetic when it comes to anything other than survivor trivia? You also didn't bothering doing a few challenges or didn't do them correctly, what makes you better than someone like Wendy in this regard? 4) Why does Brentin deserve to win this game over you? 5) For each jury member (and Brentin too) please give me three 3 adjectives you feel describe them best. 6) Compare each jury member (and Brentin too) to a real survivor castaway from any season of the show. Please state their name and the season they were from. 7) For each jury member (and Brentin too) please give their strengths and weaknesses (at least 2 of each). 8) Did you pay the entry fee to be eligible for the cash prize?
9) Did you in anyway try to influence Brentin to give you immunity at the final 4?
Questions for Brentin
1) What moves in the game did you make on your OWN (excluding voting me out and switching the order of Devyn/Jeffery)?
2) Is it not true that you said to me at the tiebreaker challenge that you didn't care if you won or lost and was ready to be done with the game?
3) What makes you think you played such a strategic game considering I called all the shots and you were just my sheep (like everyone else) the whole game?
4) You seemed to always place in the top 5 for every challenge in the game, aside from the one immunity you did win why did you not do better in these challenges? Why should we even consider the one immunity you DID win a valid victory? Keep in mind you knew Jessie and my lists for the challenge AND you did give it away to KJ.
5) Why does KJ deserve to win this game over you?
6) For each jury member (and KJ too) please give me three 3 adjectives you feel describe them best.
7) Compare each jury member (and KJ too) to a real survivor castaway from any season of the show. Please state their name and the season they were from.
8) For each jury member (and KJ too) please give their strengths and weaknesses (at least 2 of each).
9) Did you pay the entry fee to be eligible for the cash prize?
I worked hard at coming up with these questions and I expect you both to do the same when answering them. I don't want a pathetic two sentence answer so please give them your all! Based on your answers to these questions I will determine who my vote goes to. Normally I vote for the player who played the best game, but I feel that the two of you played equally crappy games. If you have any hopes at getting my vote please think about this. Best of luck to the both of you!"
|
Wow, that's quite a Jury question!
Brentin, you want to go first?
"Hey Johnny, 1) If you are looking at moves that I totally did on my own with no help from anyone than I really don't have any other than those two. Other than me being the actual one to give up my Idol at Final 4. Even though it put me at risk it was the right decision for me at that time. If I didn't do it than you would have stayed and I would have just lost anyways. For me though it's not the actual moves you do in a game that make you a good player, it's the strategic process behind them. It's easy to backstab someone one but it's the process behind it that makes it a good play. So what I'm trying to say here is No there isn't a lot of moves that I made on my own but it's my process behind it. I chose to go along with Morgan's boot order because it benefited me, I chose to not go with Austin and tell Nic you wanted him out because benefited me to have them gone, I made a Final 2 alliance with KJ because it benefited me at Final 3. So it's not the moves I made but how I angled things and why I did it that I think make me a good player. 2) Yes it is true that I said that. The reason was becuase at that point I felt pretty defeated. I had won Immunity and in a move I gave it away and now I had a huge shot at leaving. Also to make things worse I was going up against the "Challenge Master". I really thought I was going to lose and I was despressed about it so I made that comment becuase I thought that I already lost so winning or losing at that point didn't really matter to me anymore. 3) I consider myself a strategic player becuase of the position I accquired for myself in this game. I made the alliance with you which was probably the best move I made in this game. With being your number ally I gianed controll over information that other players didn't have. Everyone looked to you as their main ally and would tell you things in the safety that you wouldn't tell anyone else. You told me these thing and I knew you trusted me the most out of anyone. I knew at some point that I would have to turn on you and by doing so I would be taking out the best player and it would make me look good. I think being a strategic player is more than making a big move every round, it's about the thought porcess thats goes into everything you do to make sure that it doesn't come back to bite you. If you are the puppet-mater you deem to be than why did your most trusted ally turn on you? If you had such control than I should have stuck with you. I knew that once I made that alliance with you that I would only take it so far. And if I was your puppet than the strings must have been cut long ago becuase the last time I checked I had a brain and could think for myself. 4) The challenges in this game were usually based upon endurance and how long you can go, or how fast you can preform. No offence to the Host but a lot of these challenges were little games (like tic-tac-toe and crab race) that didn't really test my intelligence but how long I could go with out getting frusterated. I would say the competition would be the reason why I didn't win a lot challenges. But I don't think I deserve to win on my challenge ability. I tried to put as much effort into winning challenges (esp while on Morgan) when it got down to the Merge. I wasn't a huge target so when I lost I wasn't heartbroken. Towards the end I wanted to win for the sake that I kept losing. But the one thing that I needed to win was the tie-breaker challenge which I feel like I preformed to the best of my ability, becuase I hate math. 5) KJ deserves to win this game over me for one reason and that is becuase it is much harder to go throughout this entire game not pissing anyone off (except maybe Jeffery) than it is to piss a lot of people off. It's very easy to anger people in this game. I consider myself a kind person and someone who never gets in confrontation yet I am hear with a lot of people pissed at me. KJ made it here without doing that's a huge accomplishment and definatly is a deserving feet. 6)Earl-cooperative,fair,mature Jeffery- persuasive, rambunctious, faithful Devyn- outgoing, crazy, comical Austin- determined, resourceful, receptive Nicolas- loyal, outspoken, combative Johnny- knowledgeable, strong, decisive Jessie- loyal, kind, flirtatious (lol in my case) KJ- honorable, kindhearted, sincere 7) Earl-Andrew (Survivor:Pearl Islands) Jeffery- Alex (Survivor: Fiji) Devyn- Tom (Survivor: Africa) Austin- Eliza (Survivor:Vanautu) Nicolas- Sue (Survivor:Borneo) Johnny- Rob.M (Survivor: All-Stars) Jessie- Matt (Survivor: Amazon) KJ- Neleh (Survivor: Marquesas) 8) Earl Strengths': Equity Diplomatic Weaknesses: Perspective- We all saw him as a threat. Dominant Jeffery Strengths: Persuasive Self-Confident Weaknesses: Assertive Forceful Devyn Strengths: Humour friendly Weaknesses: Outspoken Careless Austin Strengths: Optimism Determined Weaknesses: Persistent- At times Austin was a little too persistent with things, and it made him come off as annoying. No offence. Incompetent - In individual challenges. Nicolas Strengths: Industrious- Nic always managed to try to work on a challenge until it was done. Reliable Weaknesses: Judgement- Nicolas trusted the wrong people. Aggressive Johnny Strengths: Ingenuity- You always found a different way to approach a challenge (or new way to do a challenge). Perseverance Weaknesses: Judgement-Put to much trust in the wrong person. Perspective- Everyone saw you as a threat Jessie Strengths: Sincere Loyalty Weaknesses: Eager- At times Jessie was to Eager and wanted to do things her own way (Like with the whole Fiers thing) Irrational KJ Strengths: Versatile Reliable Weaknesses: Over-Confident Patient- I only say because KJ waited to make moves until someone came to her first. 9) No, I did not pay the entry fee."
|
|
|
K.J., it's your turn.
|
|
"Hey Johnny 1. Yes, I had an alliance with Sara. We had the alliance from the very beginning. Sara and I have had alliances in the past 2 games we have played together. 2. I had talked to Devlyn and Austin about alliances, but it never did pan out because they were in the minority. At F4, Brentin and I entered into an alliance. I also tried to get Jessie to do an all girl F2. I was true to our alliance Johnny. Like we have talked about. I was serious about F2 with you from day one. I don't usually do alliances only to break them. It's not my style at all. I know some people do it and do it well, but I just dont. 3. In regards to challenges.. i sucked at some of the challenges yes. I was unable to submit one or two because of the fact that I was at the hospital and I couldn't access the website. I also have never really been a challenge whore. I mean, if my back is up against the wall and I know I'm going home if I dont get immunity, I will bust my ass to win (F3 for example) but with our alliance so tight and you so good at challenges, I didn't see the need to even attempt to beat you. You are good at almost everything and Im not really good at the games that were picked. I love scatergories and trivia and I really enjoyed the F3 challenge although it drove me insane. I also had a fun time with the challenge you keep saying I won, but the directions were so unclear. I understood it. . and although I couldnt' get the audio, I did my best. I never purposely set out to either do poorly on the challenges, or not do them at all. Never. 4. Why does Brentin deserve to win this game over me? I don't think he does. We both played differently, but that doesn't mean he played any better/worse than me. 5. 3 adjectives to describe all jury members. Earl - outspoken, confident, sweet Jeffrey - personable, determined, honest Devlyn - sweet, determined, playful Austin - flexible, obnoxious (lol), imaginative Nic - loyal, smart, strategic Johnny - determined, confident, smart Jessie - sincere, consistent, naive Brentin - sneaky, determined, likeable 6. Compare the jury to real Survivors Earl - Lex de Berghe - Africa Jeffrey - Ethan Zahn - Africa Devlyn - Neleh Dennis - Marquesas Austin - Johnny Fairplay (couldn't resist) - Pearl Islands Nicholas - Aras Baskauskas - Panama Johnny - Jonathon Penner - Cook Islands Jessie - Colleen Haskill - Borneo Brentin - Ian Rostenberger - Palau 7. Jury members strengths and weaknesses Earl - strengths - hard worker, confident weaknesses - outspoken, quiet Jeffrey - strengths - good at challenges, likeable weaknesses - loyal, not aggressive Devlyn - strengths - personable, strong weaknesses - trusting, quiet Austin - strengths - adaptable, tenacious weaknesses - talks too much, aligns quickly Nic - strengths - strategic, critical thinker weaknesses - honest, trusting Johnny - strengths - determined, aggressive weaknesses - cocky, lies easily Jessie - strengths - very sweet, consistent weaknesses - loyal to a fault, naive Brentin - strengths - personable, determined weaknesses - takes more credit than deserved, lies 8. Did I pay an entry fee? No 9. Did I influence Brentin in any way to give me immunity. Well, when he won immunity I asked him to give it to me to keep me safe and explained to him why it made sense. We went over all the scenarios and I assured him that he would remain safe. I believe I did influence him. He did not bring it up to me at all. Thank you for your questions Johnny. I did enjoy our convos in this game and I did enjoy getting to know you. KJ" |
|